BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//PYVOBJECT//NONSGML Version 1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Shanghai
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20000101T000000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=1
TZNAME:CST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20260615T140110Z - 31702@iZuf69e0i0z4ibdboqb33jZ
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260305T190000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260305T210000
CREATED:20260615T140110Z
DESCRIPTION:<a href="http://popcornclubshanghai.com/event/selling-your-iden
 tity-ai-image-rights-ethics-the-case-of-khaby-lame-45272/register">Selling
  Your Identity: AI Image Rights & Ethics\, The Case Of Khaby Lame </a>\nAr
 e we at the stage where a person's identity can be sold for use with AI sy
 stems? Khaby Lame (the most followed creator on TikTok - if you don't know
  his name\, you definitely know his face) has done just that. So where is 
 this going? What's next? What about all of the many legal and ethical issu
 es it brings about? What does it mean when a celebrity sells the rights to
  their face\, voice\, or mannerisms for AI-generated content? Is that just
  the next step of branding? Or something fundamentally different? When som
 eone like Khaby Lame licenses their image to AI systems\, are they trading
  publicity as usual\, or are they turning identity itself into a product? 
 And once an image can be endlessly generated\, remixed\, and placed into c
 ontexts the person never chose\, where does the “real” version stop an
 d the artificial one begin? In this discussion\, we’ll explore how AI id
 entity licensing differs from traditional image rights\, copyright\, and e
 ndorsement deals\, and why those old frameworks may no longer be enough. W
 e’ll look at questions of responsibility when an AI-generated version ca
 uses harm or backlash\, who is accountable in cases of misuse or “cancel
  culture\,” and whether anyone can truly control an identity once it’s
  been digitised. Finally\, we’ll push the question further: what happens
  to these rights after death? Does an AI version of a person outlive them 
 as property\, legacy\, or something stranger? A fascinating\, slightly uns
 ettling conversation about fame\, technology\, ownership\, and what it mea
 ns to be “you” in the age of AI. 我们是不是已经走到这样一
 个阶段：一个人的“身份”可以被卖给 AI 系统使用？Khab
 y Lame（TikTok 上粉丝最多的创作者——就算没听过名字，
 你也一定刷到过他的脸）已经这么做了。那接下来会发
 生什么？这件事会往哪个方向发展？它又会带来多少法
 律和伦理上的问题？ 当一个公众人物把自己的脸、声音
 ，甚至标志性的动作授权给 AI 生成内容使用，这到底意
 味着什么？只是品牌延伸的下一步，还是一件本质上不
 同的事情？当像 Khaby Lame 这样的人把自己的形象授权给 A
 I 系统，他是在进行一次常规的曝光交易，还是把“身份
 ”本身变成了一种商品？当一个形象可以被无限生成、
 重组、放进当事人从未选择过的语境里，“真实”的版
 本到底从哪里开始消失，人工生成的版本又从哪里开始
 占据主导？ [...]
DTSTAMP:20260615T140110Z
LOCATION:China\,\, Shanghai
SUMMARY:Selling Your Identity: AI Image Rights & Ethics\, The Case Of Khaby
  Lame 
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR